From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | Amol Inamdar <amol(dot)aai(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bypassing Directory Ownership Check in PostgreSQL 16.6 with Secure z/OS NFS (AT-TLS) |
Date: | 2025-07-14 14:07:20 |
Message-ID: | 609925.1752502040@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> It is not a good idea to have a mount point be the data directory.
^^^ This. ^^^
That is primarily for safety reasons: if for some reason the
filesystem gets dismounted, or hasn't come on-line yet during
a reboot, you do not want Postgres to be able to write on the
underlying mount-point directory. There is a sobering tale
in this old thread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/41BFAB7C.5040108%40joeconway.com
Now it didn't help any that they were using a start script that
would automatically run initdb if it didn't see a data directory
where expected. But even without that, you are in for a world of
hurt if the mount drops while the server is running and the server
has any ability to write on the underlying storage; it will think
whatever it was able to write is safely down on disk. To prevent
that, the server must not have write permissions on the mount
point, which dictates making a separate data directory (with
different ownership/permissions) just below the mount.
Do not bypass that ownership/permissions check. It is there
for very good reasons.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-07-14 14:41:26 | Re: Bypassing Directory Ownership Check in PostgreSQL 16.6 with Secure z/OS NFS (AT-TLS) |
Previous Message | Amol Inamdar | 2025-07-14 13:02:23 | Re: Bypassing Directory Ownership Check in PostgreSQL 16.6 with Secure z/OS NFS (AT-TLS) |