Re: further explain changes

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Jaime Casanova
>>> why not let it go in ANALYZE, just as the sort info
>
>> It's kinda long-winded - it adds like 4 extra lines for each hash
>> join.  I don't think I want to add that much clutter to regular E-A
>> output.
>
> Well, that would only happen if you're deliberately obtuse about the
> formatting.  The sort code manages to fit all the extra on one line,
> and I don't see why hash couldn't.
>
> I'd vote for just adding it in the exact same cases that sort adds extra
> info.  -1 for either adding a new option or changing the meaning of the
> ones that are there.

Care to suggest a format?

...Robert