| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: next CommitFest |
| Date: | 2009-11-12 18:32:15 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070911121032m63f956e8ud2c9882cfe8b3202@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Albert Cervera i Areny
<albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com> wrote:
> A Dijous, 12 de novembre de 2009, Euler Taveira de Oliveira va escriure:
>> Simon Riggs escreveu:
>> > So, I
>> > propose that we simply ignore patches from developers until they have
>> > done sufficient review to be allowed to develop again.
>>
>> Is it really impolite for a first-contributor, no?
>>
>
> I don't think so, as long as it's properly explained.
Personally, I would not propose to impose this rule of first-time
contributors, or even second-time contributors. But by about patch #3
I think everyone should be pitching in.
Just MHO, of course.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-11-12 18:33:41 | Re: array_to_string bug? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-11-12 18:31:07 | Re: next CommitFest |