Re: next CommitFest

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: next CommitFest
Date: 2009-11-12 18:38:19
Message-ID: 20091112183818.GF4780@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas escribió:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Albert Cervera i Areny
> <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com> wrote:
> > A Dijous, 12 de novembre de 2009, Euler Taveira de Oliveira va escriure:
> >> Simon Riggs escreveu:
> >> > So, I
> >> > propose that we simply ignore patches from developers until they have
> >> > done sufficient review to be allowed to develop again.
> >>
> >> Is it really impolite for a first-contributor, no?
> >
> > I don't think so, as long as it's properly explained.
>
> Personally, I would not propose to impose this rule of first-time
> contributors, or even second-time contributors. But by about patch #3
> I think everyone should be pitching in.

+1. It's OK to not review anything if you're just doing a one-off. If
you submit a bunch of patches you start becoming part of the community.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-12 18:40:38 Re: plpgsql GUC variable: custom or built-in?
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2009-11-12 18:38:07 Re: Listen / Notify rewrite