Re: per table random-page-cost?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, marcin mank <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: per table random-page-cost?
Date: 2009-10-22 18:48:46
Message-ID: 603c8f070910221148u67493436o260a7502e948b554@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> All,
>
> Wouldn't per *tablespace* costs make more sense?
>
> --Josh

Yes, we already had several votes in favor of that approach. See upthread.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-10-22 19:13:23 Re: Controlling changes in plpgsql variable resolution
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-10-22 18:41:23 Re: per table random-page-cost?