Re: per table random-page-cost?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, marcin mank <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: per table random-page-cost?
Date: 2009-11-09 23:56:29
Message-ID: 200911092356.nA9NuTn26523@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Wouldn't per *tablespace* costs make more sense?
> >
> > --Josh
>
> Yes, we already had several votes in favor of that approach. See upthread.

Added to TODO:

Allow per-tablespace random_page_cost

* http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg01128.php

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-11-10 01:01:51 Re: Hot Standby and 64+ subxids (was COPY enhancements)
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-11-09 23:37:11 Re: Typed tables