From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf? |
Date: | 2009-10-01 02:39:01 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070909301939h35d27825r1c686079a409559b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The advantage of this is that connections made with "-h machine_name"
> instead of "-h localhost" would work without customization. I can't
> see any disadvantage to it. Making the change now would also give
> us an opportunity to test the samehost/samenet implementation in the
> buildfarm, at least for machines without Unix sockets.
>
> (Note that you would still need a non-default setting of
> listen_addresses for "-h machine_name" to actually work.)
>
> Comments?
I don't see much advantage in this proposal, at least not immediately.
If it turns out to be a wildly popular feature and doesn't turn out
to introduce security vulnerabilities or breakage, we can always make
this change later.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2009-10-01 02:40:27 | Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review) |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-10-01 02:34:10 | Re: Use "samehost" by default in pg_hba.conf? |