| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN ... SET DISTINCT |
| Date: | 2009-08-03 00:31:48 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070908021731u55065ddchaf2ca12f3f99fd41@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> writes:
>> Yes, and as I didn't have the time to install filterdiff I've attached
>> a revision of your patch in git format which adresses the problem I
>> mentioned, in a tarball also containing raw notes, tests, and
>> regression.{out,diffs}.
>
> Applied with assorted corrections, plus the just-discussed change of
> syntax to SET STATISTICS DISTINCT.
Thanks. The changes all look good - except I'm curious why %g vs. %f?
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-03 00:35:11 | Re: ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN ... SET DISTINCT |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-03 00:06:41 | Re: change in timestamp output from 8.3 to 8.4 |