Re: Performances with new Intel Core* processors

My theory, based entirely on what I have read in this thread, is that a low
end server (really a small workstation) with an Intel Dual Core CPU is
likely an excellent PG choice for the lowest end.

I'll try to snag an Intel Dual Core workstation in the near future and
report back DBT2 scores comparing it to a similarly equiped 1 socket AMD
dual core workstation. I'll keep the data size small to fit entirely in
RAM so the DBT2 isn't it's usual disk bound dog when you run it the "right"
way (according to tpc-c guidelines).

--Denis
Dweeb from EnterpriseDB

On 8/1/06, Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de> wrote:
>
> * Arjen van der Meijden:
>
> > For a database system, however, processors hardly ever are the main
> > bottleneck, are they?
>
> Not directly, but the choice of processor influences which
> chipsets/mainboards are available, which in turn has some impact on
> the number of RAM slots. (According to our hardware supplier, beyound
> 8 GB, the price per GB goes up sharply.) Unfortunately, it seems that
> the Core 2 Duo mainboards do not change that much in this area.
>
> --
> Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>
> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
> Durlacher Allee 47 tel: +49-721-96201-1
> D-76131 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>