Re: Showing parallel status in \df+

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Date: 2016-08-24 12:40:04
Message-ID: 5f45f67b-a67a-8be4-47b6-b3521944fd83@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/22/16 1:52 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> If I understand to purpose of this patch - it is compromise - PL source
> is removed from table, but it is printed in result.

What does it do if you are displaying more than one function?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2016-08-24 12:53:22 Re: Strange result with LATERAL query
Previous Message Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?= 2016-08-24 12:11:43 Re: [PATCH] Alter or rename enum value