Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix
Date: 2016-10-13 02:44:02
Message-ID: 5f43d531-6fcb-2ecf-a8ac-dcab08adb168@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/12/16 11:58 AM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> (Yes, the '' default might be fine for syslog, but I don't think
> that's a good argument for sticking with it for default installs. I've
> seen way too many useless log files out there, and at worst we'll have
> syslogs with two timestamps.)

We'd have to think of a way to sort this out during upgrades.
Documentation might be enough.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-13 03:01:31 Re: parallel.sgml
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-10-13 02:40:23 Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix