| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage |
| Date: | 2022-08-12 07:07:18 |
| Message-ID: | 5ccec641-9c06-6083-c22e-931fa99f3e81@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11.08.22 19:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> On 2022-08-11 10:52:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> -- I won't be too surprised if we get pushback on that after 15.0 is out.
>
>> From what angle?
>
> If I knew that, it'd be because we'd already received the pushback.
> I'm just suspicious that very little beta testing happens on Windows,
> and what does is probably mostly people running up-to-date Windows.
> So I think there's plenty of chance for "hey, this no longer works"
> complaints later. Maybe we'll be able to reject it all with "sorry,
> we desupported that version of Windows", but I dunno.
What is changing in PG15 about this? Unix-domain sockets on Windows are
supported as of PG13.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2022-08-12 07:12:15 | Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2022-08-12 06:59:30 | Re: fix typos |