| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage |
| Date: | 2022-08-11 17:19:08 |
| Message-ID: | 21173.1660238348@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2022-08-11 10:52:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> -- I won't be too surprised if we get pushback on that after 15.0 is out.
> From what angle?
If I knew that, it'd be because we'd already received the pushback.
I'm just suspicious that very little beta testing happens on Windows,
and what does is probably mostly people running up-to-date Windows.
So I think there's plenty of chance for "hey, this no longer works"
complaints later. Maybe we'll be able to reject it all with "sorry,
we desupported that version of Windows", but I dunno.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zhihong Yu | 2022-08-11 17:30:07 | avoid negating LONG_MIN in cash_out() |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-08-11 17:17:40 | Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size |