Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies
Date: 2021-05-05 21:23:16
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/5/21 5:12 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 8:58 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> this is an open item for release 14 . The discussion seems to have gone
>> silent for a couple of weeks. Are we in a position to make any
>> decisions? I hear what Andres says, but is anyone acting on it?
> I'm going to revert this and resubmit for 15. That'll give proper
> time to reconsider the question of whether pg_depend is right for
> this, and come up with a non-rushed response to the composite type
> problem etc.

OK, thanks.



Andrew Dunstan

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias van de Meent 2021-05-05 22:18:17 Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-05-05 21:22:37 Re: Dubious assertion in RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker