Re: pg_get_serial_sequence Strangeness/Unreliable?

From: Jeff MacDonald <oss(at)bignose(dot)ca>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_get_serial_sequence Strangeness/Unreliable?
Date: 2008-12-03 15:11:28
Message-ID: 5EF3BF1D-16E1-4A37-A596-6D55E910E3C9@bignose.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

ALTER SEQUENCE OWNED BY worked!

Thanks folks.

jeff.

On 26-Nov-08, at 1:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Jeff MacDonald wrote:
>
>> Hi Tom, so far as I know the table "owns" the serial in so much as
>> when i
>> do a \d of the table it says this
>>
>> status_id | integer | not null default
>> nextval('status_status_id_seq'::regclass)
>>
>> How else can I check?
>
> He means ALTER SEQUENCE ... OWNED BY
>
> I don't know how you can ensure that it is, short of
>
> begin;
> drop table status;
> \d status_status_id_seq
> -- verify that the sequence exists; if owned, it should have been
> dropped too
> rollback;
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Harrison 2008-12-03 15:43:05 Limit on number of databases in a Cluster ?
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2008-12-03 14:37:44 Re: Corruption in postgres 7.4 on solaris 2.9.