| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff MacDonald <oss(at)bignose(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_get_serial_sequence Strangeness/Unreliable? |
| Date: | 2008-11-26 17:04:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20081126170418.GI4275@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jeff MacDonald wrote:
> Hi Tom, so far as I know the table "owns" the serial in so much as when i
> do a \d of the table it says this
>
> status_id | integer | not null default
> nextval('status_status_id_seq'::regclass)
>
> How else can I check?
He means ALTER SEQUENCE ... OWNED BY
I don't know how you can ensure that it is, short of
begin;
drop table status;
\d status_status_id_seq
-- verify that the sequence exists; if owned, it should have been dropped too
rollback;
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vishal Arora | 2008-11-26 17:25:11 | Re: PgAgent Job Scehduler is NOT running |
| Previous Message | Jeff MacDonald | 2008-11-26 17:00:28 | Re: pg_get_serial_sequence Strangeness/Unreliable? |