| From: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kartik Ohri <kartikohri13(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: GSoC Proposal |
| Date: | 2020-03-29 21:33:45 |
| Message-ID: | 5E811439.8050109@anastigmatix.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/29/20 15:18, Kartik Ohri wrote:
> Hi! I have shared the proposal with him directly. But as I was made aware
> that the project's prospective mentors are not at much liberty to give
> feedback on the proposal due to mentor guidelines, I wished if someone else
I'll add to that in case I could have misunderstood the mentor guidelines;
we have been in some communication about the parameters of the project,
but I was not sure how much involvement I should have in the preparation
of the proposal itself.
Is that in line with how other mentors for PostgreSQL have approached it?
Regards,
-Chap
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2020-03-29 22:20:01 | Re: Potential (low likelihood) wraparound hazard in heap_abort_speculative() |
| Previous Message | Shay Rojansky | 2020-03-29 21:31:42 | Creating a database with a non-predefined collation |