Re: Unnecessary asterisk in comment in postgres_fdw.c

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unnecessary asterisk in comment in postgres_fdw.c
Date: 2018-11-29 04:55:24
Message-ID: 5BFF713C.20600@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2018/11/28 23:31), Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 08:51:54AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:46:51AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> On 2018-Nov-28, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:25:34PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>>>> Here is a small patch for removing $SUBJECT.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed. Patch applied through PG 10, where this first appeared.
>>>
>>> Why wouldn't Fujita-san push this patch himself?
>>
>> I was wondering that myself, but thought maybe he was busy and wanted
>> someone else to do it.
>
> Actually, it was so simple I thought he would just apply it, but he
> might have been following the protocol of posting the patch first, and
> in that case, I interfered by applying it. Sorry.

No problem! Thanks for taking care of this, Bruce!

(I also thought that was simple, but my first language is not English,
so I thought it would be better to give others a chance for reviewing
that. Maybe my explanation in a previous email was not enough. Sorry
about that.)

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-11-29 05:00:47 Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-11-29 04:05:56 Re: pgbench: improve --help and --version parsing