Re: Unnecessary asterisk in comment in postgres_fdw.c

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unnecessary asterisk in comment in postgres_fdw.c
Date: 2018-11-28 14:31:57
Message-ID: 20181128143157.GE24817@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 08:51:54AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:46:51AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On 2018-Nov-28, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:25:34PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > > > Here is a small patch for removing $SUBJECT.
> > >
> > > Agreed. Patch applied through PG 10, where this first appeared.
> >
> > Why wouldn't Fujita-san push this patch himself?
>
> I was wondering that myself, but thought maybe he was busy and wanted
> someone else to do it.

Actually, it was so simple I thought he would just apply it, but he
might have been following the protocol of posting the patch first, and
in that case, I interfered by applying it. Sorry.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Verite 2018-11-28 15:25:47 Re: Markdown format output for psql, design notes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-11-28 14:30:21 Re: "pg_ctl: the PID file ... is empty" at end of make check