| From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: list partition constraint shape |
| Date: | 2018-01-26 12:31:58 |
| Message-ID: | 5A6B1FBE.6020102@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/01/26 10:15), Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/01/25 21:17, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> Some minor comments:
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Construct an ArrayExpr for the non-null partition
>> + * values
>> + */
>> + arrexpr = makeNode(ArrayExpr);
>> + arrexpr->array_typeid =
>> + !type_is_array(key->parttypid[0])
>> + ? get_array_type(key->parttypid[0])
>> + : key->parttypid[0];
>>
>> We test the type_is_array() above in this bit, so I don't think we need to
>> test that again here.
>
> Ah, you're right. Fixed.
Thanks. I think the updated version is fine, but I think we can
simplify the change in this part a bit further, so I modified your
patch. I also adjusted some comments in that change a little bit.
Attached is a modified version of the patch. What do you think about
that? Please let me know. If that is okay, I'll mark this as Ready for
Committer.
> Attached updated patch. Thanks again.
Thanks for updating the patch!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-Change-how-list-partition-constraint-is-emitted-efujita.patch | text/x-diff | 12.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-01-26 12:45:52 | Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: pg_(total_)relation_size and partitioned tables |
| Previous Message | Yugo Nagata | 2018-01-26 12:30:49 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views |