| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jakub Glapa <jakub(dot)glapa(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ERROR: too many dynamic shared memory segments |
| Date: | 2018-02-02 20:56:56 |
| Message-ID: | 5929.1517605016@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Do you mind if I change that Assert to a run-time test?
> Hrm, I guess I could have done something like
> shm_toc_lookup(pcxt->toc, PARALLEL_KEY_ERROR_QUEUE, (pcxt->nworkers ==
> 0)).
OK, that'd work too. I'll make it so.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2018-02-03 05:27:35 | Re: Postgres Planner "Inconsistency"? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-02-02 20:19:49 | Re: ERROR: too many dynamic shared memory segments |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-02-02 21:05:25 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2018-02-02 20:54:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). |