Re: Assert the timestamp is available for ORIGN_DIFFERS conflicts

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Assert the timestamp is available for ORIGN_DIFFERS conflicts
Date: 2026-01-23 04:51:35
Message-ID: 5901BDE1-4726-4823-B69E-3111AE368C60@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Jan 23, 2026, at 12:32, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Dear Amit, Chao,
>
> Thanks for giving comments. But I do not want to move the Assert() atop
> switch-case statements; the function would be dirty for other cases.
> Attached patch updates condition and comments based on your suggestions.
>
> Best regards,
> Hayato Kuroda
> FUJITSU LIMITED
>
> <v3-0001-Add-Assert-for-UPDATE-DELETE-_ORIGIN_DIFFERS.patch>

Thanks for updating the patch. V3 looks good to me.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2026-01-23 05:29:22 Re: More speedups for tuple deformation
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-01-23 04:42:52 Re: Remove PG_MMAP_FLAGS