Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Is it at all reasonable to try to create some mechanism so that
> exceptions (elog) that are caught and not rethrown do not end up in the
> log? For example, when you write code that does something like
> try
> insert
> catch unique_constraint_violation
> update
> end try
> this will end up cluttering the logs with all the constraint violation
> messages.
Really? It's not supposed to.
regards, tom lane