Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Date: 2007-10-23 23:24:21
Message-ID: 5779.1193181861@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Mind you, I'm in favor of one. A new SCM would make some other development
> tasks easier. However, I'm reluctant to open the can-of-worms which is the
> "what SCM should we use" discussion again, and complicate something which
> we seem to have consensus on.

As near as I can tell, the arguments for a new SCM mostly apply to work
which individual developers are doing outside the main tree. So, given
the existence of stuff like git-cvsimport, I don't see a strong reason
why anyone who wants to work that way can't already sync the core CVS
with a local SCM-of-their-choice and get on with it.

You're right that this is utterly unrelated to the scheduling question,
anyway.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-10-23 23:42:20 Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2007-10-23 23:19:22 Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4