Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Date: 2016-04-11 16:46:11
Message-ID: 570BD4D3.70800@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 04/11/2016 09:11 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> (note there are a couple that are obvious, heap metapage, optimise FSM
>> etc...)
>
> But it's not obvious why those things require breaking compatibility,
> and pgsql-advocacy is not the right mailing list to discuss that.

Agreed.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh berkus 2016-04-11 17:10:47 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Previous Message Justin Clift 2016-04-11 16:43:18 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0