From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
Date: | 2016-04-11 16:43:18 |
Message-ID: | 0C50D4E6-EAB5-4067-82E3-29B6B1C0A8B4@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 11 Apr 2016, at 17:11, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> (note there are a couple that are obvious, heap metapage, optimise FSM
>> etc...)
>
> But it's not obvious why those things require breaking compatibility,
> and pgsql-advocacy is not the right mailing list to discuss that.
> There has been no recent discussion of any of this on pgsql-hackers.
Good point. Just emailed -hackers with a starter stub for it, so it can
be discussed there:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/954A2020-828D-47E8-A57E-AEC3643FE390@postgresql.org
;)
+ Justin
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-04-11 16:46:11 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-11 16:11:35 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |