Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Date: 2016-04-11 16:43:18
Message-ID: 0C50D4E6-EAB5-4067-82E3-29B6B1C0A8B4@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 11 Apr 2016, at 17:11, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> (note there are a couple that are obvious, heap metapage, optimise FSM
>> etc...)
>
> But it's not obvious why those things require breaking compatibility,
> and pgsql-advocacy is not the right mailing list to discuss that.
> There has been no recent discussion of any of this on pgsql-hackers.

Good point. Just emailed -hackers with a starter stub for it, so it can
be discussed there:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/954A2020-828D-47E8-A57E-AEC3643FE390@postgresql.org

;)

+ Justin

--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-04-11 16:46:11 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-04-11 16:11:35 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0