| From: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-04-09 18:50:02 |
| Message-ID: | 57094EDA.8090708@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 4/7/16 1:54 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I think that's a pretty hand-wavy statement until the problems have
> been documented, along with some thought and estimation of potential
> compatible work-arounds.
>
>
> By hand-wavy, you mean not fully worked out? Yes, neither the pros and
> cons have been worked out in detail, so opposing the idea is on the same
> shaky ground. How then to proceed?
Do we even have a list of things we'd like to do that would break
compatibility? I haven't seen one...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2016-04-09 19:07:52 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Sameer Kumar | 2016-04-09 02:35:36 | Re: Some pictures from the 1st meetup of Islamabad PUG |