Re: pg_ctl promote wait

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl promote wait
Date: 2016-03-16 16:19:17
Message-ID: 56E98785.70404@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Peter,

On 3/9/16 3:08 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:

> Here are some comments about 0002
<...>
> I think that we had better do something like the attached first.
> Thoughts?

It's been a week since Michael reviewed this patch. Could you please
comment on his proposed changes as soon as possible?

Thanks,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2016-03-16 16:19:47 Re: Updated backup APIs for non-exclusive backups
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-03-16 16:16:30 Re: Choosing parallel_degree