Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Date: 2016-03-13 22:54:30
Message-ID: 56E5EFA6.5080401@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/11/16 6:45 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I'll add that if people like the interface you propose. (Overloading
> the VACUUM cost delay functions to cause a delay for amcheck
> functions, too).

I thought that had already been overloaded by CIC, but I'm not finding
reference to it... ANALYZE does use it though, so the ship has already
sorta sailed.

I'm actually a bit surprised cost delay isn't used anywhere else. As
more background operations are added I suspect users will want it at
some point.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2016-03-13 23:05:16 Re: [patch] Proposal for \crosstabview in psql
Previous Message Noah Misch 2016-03-13 22:46:41 Re: Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system