Re: 2016-03 Commitfest

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2016-03 Commitfest
Date: 2016-03-12 00:07:41
Message-ID: 56E35DCD.9020900@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

We're are now one third of the way through the 2016-03 Commitfest.

There are still some patches left that need review but have no reviewer
(https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/?reviewer=-2) though a lot have
been picked up in the last week.

Needs review: 56
Needs *reviewer*: 15 (was 58 last week)

There were a number of patches that were marked as "needs review" but
were actually "waiting for author" as far as I could see. If your patch
is in this state it would be good if you could give an idea when you
will be able to supply a new patch or otherwise address concerns raised
in the thread.

Waiting on Author: 29

The closed patches are up significantly since last week and the good
news is that most of them were committed. 36% of the patches are now
closed.

Committed: 46
Rejected: 4
Returned with Feedback: 4

I will continue to respond individually to threads that seem idle or
have issues that need to be resolved. Please do not hesitate to contact
me about about any concerns that you might have regarding the Commitfest
process.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-03-12 00:17:54 Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2016-03-12 00:01:07 Re: Relation extension scalability