|From:||David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>|
|To:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||"Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Inconsistent error handling in START_REPLICATION command|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 3/11/16 1:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:36 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>>> It looks like a decision needs to be made here whether to apply this patch,
>>> send it back to the author, or reject it so I'm marking it "Ready for
>>> Robert, since you were participating in this conversation can you have a
>> Who, me? *looks around*
>> OK, I had a look. I don't think this is a bug.
> I agree, and Craig's complaint that this change reduces flexibility
> for plugins seems to tilt the balance against it. I see that Alex
> himself accepted that argument in his last message in the thread
> So let's mark it rejected and move on.
+1 and done.
|Next Message||Oleg Bartunov||2016-03-11 18:24:19||Re: WIP: Access method extendability|
|Previous Message||Tom Lane||2016-03-11 18:11:43||Re: Inconsistent error handling in START_REPLICATION command|