| From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Relation extension scalability |
| Date: | 2016-03-10 02:25:01 |
| Message-ID: | 56E0DAFD.7020401@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/03/16 02:53, Dilip Kumar wrote:
>
> Attaching a latest patch.
>
Hmm, why did you remove the comment above the call to
UnlockRelationForExtension? It still seems relevant, maybe with some
minor modification?
Also there is a bit of whitespace mess inside the conditional lock block.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tsunakawa, Takayuki | 2016-03-10 03:17:29 | Re: [HACKERS] How can we expand PostgreSQL ecosystem? |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2016-03-10 02:00:39 | Re: Reworks of CustomScan serialization/deserialization |