Re: HINTing on UPDATE foo SET = ..;

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers >> PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HINTing on UPDATE foo SET = ..;
Date: 2016-03-09 22:39:33
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/23/15 9:15 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> wrote:
>>> Hopefully nobody minds if I slip this to the commit fest that started
>>> today? The attached patch should address all the comments from the 9.5
>>> cycle.
>> All the previous comments have been addressed. Perhaps some regression tests
>> would have some value?
> This thread has been stalling for a couple of weeks now. I have marked
> it as "returned with feedback". Marko, if you are still working on
> this patch, could you add some regression tests and then move it to
> the next CF?
This was submitted to the 2016-03 CF but no new patch was supplied and
there's been no activity on the thread for months. I'm marking it as
"returned with feedback."

Marko, if can address Michael's concerns or supply a new patch I'll be
happy to open the CF entry again.



In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Breen Hagan 2016-03-09 22:44:18 Re: BUG #13755: pgwin32_is_service not checking if SECURITY_SERVICE_SID is disabled
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-03-09 21:30:44 Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc