Re: Re: Add generate_series(date, date) and generate_series(date, date, integer)

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Add generate_series(date, date) and generate_series(date, date, integer)
Date: 2016-02-02 18:08:16
Message-ID: 56B0F090.1020705@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/2/16 1:01 PM, Corey Huinker wrote:
> Doh, I left that comment to myself in there. :)

If I had a dime for every time I've done that...

> The corresponding structs in timestamp.c and int.c have no comment, so
> suggestions of what should be there are welcome. In the interim I put in
> this:
>
> /* state for generate_series_date(date,date,[step]) */

I think that's fine -- whoever commits it may feel otherwise.

> Do you have any insight as to why the documentation test failed?
>
> In the mean time, here's the updated patch.

I didn't pass the docs on account of the wonky comment since I consider
code comments to be part of the docs. The sgml docs build fine and look
good to me.

I'll retest and update the review accordingly.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2016-02-02 18:20:01 Re: Re: Add generate_series(date, date) and generate_series(date, date, integer)
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2016-02-02 18:01:22 Re: Re: Add generate_series(date, date) and generate_series(date, date, integer)