Re: Implementing a new Scripting Language

From: "Igal (at) Lucee(dot)org" <igal(at)lucee(dot)org>
To: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Implementing a new Scripting Language
Date: 2016-01-27 21:31:09
Message-ID: 56A9371D.10206@lucee.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/27/2016 11:47 AM, Chapman Flack wrote:
>
> Thanks. :) On occasions in the past I have written it
> correctly ... there is evidence in the archives ....
I believe that! I actually never remember if it's 223 or 233 and I
always google it before I post, so in a way I cheated ;)
>
>> we will be able to use Javascript
>> through that via the Nashorn project,
> Yes, that's an attraction for me, as the JSR-two-twenty-three
> engine for JS is now typically already included with the JRE.
> (Technically, I keep reading that there is no two-twenty-three
> engine that *needs* to be included and it's totally up to the
> JRE packager ... but there have actually been some JavaScript
> snippets in PL/Java's build process since July 2014 and no one
> has yet reported they broke the build.)
This can be a major thing. I will open a ticket in
https://github.com/tada/pljava -- or is it already on the roadmap?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-01-27 21:33:06 Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-01-27 21:20:39 Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions