Re: Implementing a new Scripting Language

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To: "Igal (at) Lucee(dot)org" <igal(at)lucee(dot)org>, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Implementing a new Scripting Language
Date: 2016-01-27 19:47:48
Message-ID: 56A91EE4.5000809@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/27/2016 02:06 PM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote:

> two-twenty-three, not thirty ;)),

Thanks. :) On occasions in the past I have written it
correctly ... there is evidence in the archives ....

> we will be able to use Javascript
> through that via the Nashorn project,

Yes, that's an attraction for me, as the JSR-two-twenty-three
engine for JS is now typically already included with the JRE.
(Technically, I keep reading that there is no two-twenty-three
engine that *needs* to be included and it's totally up to the
JRE packager ... but there have actually been some JavaScript
snippets in PL/Java's build process since July 2014 and no one
has yet reported they broke the build.)

-Chap

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message james 2016-01-27 20:04:56 Re: WAL Re-Writes
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-01-27 19:33:05 Re: [Proposal] Table partition + join pushdown