Re: CoC [Final]

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Steve Litt <slitt(at)troubleshooters(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CoC [Final]
Date: 2016-01-23 02:19:05
Message-ID: 56A2E319.5070000@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 01/21/2016 12:40 PM, Steve Litt wrote:

> "Disruption of the collaborative space" is almost meaningless, and
> almost guarantees selective enforcement.
>
> On the other hand, "patterns of behaviour which the majority of the
> core team consider to be harassment" is crystal clear. What would
> happen if you just dropped "Disruption of the collaborative space"? If
> not, I'd suggest a much more definitive substitute for that phrase.

* Participants who engage in behaviour which can be reasonably
considered harassment, will not be tolerated.

As mentioned previously who is doing the enforcement is not yet
determined. It should not be part of the CoC.

Sincerely,

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-01-23 02:47:33 CoC [Final v2]
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-01-23 02:14:00 Re: Let's Do the CoC Right