| From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS |
| Date: | 2016-01-07 19:20:27 |
| Message-ID: | 568EBA7B.6030801@BlueTreble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/7/16 1:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Jim Nasby wrote:
>
>> Also worth noting: the only reason I'm using pg_regress is it's the easiest
>> way to get a test cluster. If not for that, I'd just use pg_prove since I'm
>> already using pgTap.
>
> In 9.5 you might want to "use PostgresNode" which allows you to initdb
> and such.
Oooh, thanks! I might well just copy that into my pgxntool utility.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-01-07 19:38:59 | Re: Function and view to retrieve WAL receiver status |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-01-07 19:04:21 | Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS |