Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS
Date: 2016-01-07 19:04:21
Message-ID: 20160107190421.GA448981@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim Nasby wrote:

> Also worth noting: the only reason I'm using pg_regress is it's the easiest
> way to get a test cluster. If not for that, I'd just use pg_prove since I'm
> already using pgTap.

In 9.5 you might want to "use PostgresNode" which allows you to initdb
and such.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2016-01-07 19:20:27 Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2016-01-07 18:50:16 Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS