Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain
Date: 2016-01-06 08:59:48
Message-ID: 568CD784.20804@proxel.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/06/2016 01:13 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I've pushed the second patch now. I made a few adjustments --- notably,
>> I didn't like the way you'd implemented '*' wildcards, because they
>> wouldn't have behaved very sanely in combination with '|'. The case
>> doesn't come up in the current set of patterns, but we'll likely want it
>> sometime.
>
> Thanks! Let's consider this project as done then. That was a long way to it...

Thanks to everyone involved in cleaning this up, it is much easier to
add tab completions now.

Andreas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-01-06 09:00:23 Re: Function and view to retrieve WAL receiver status
Previous Message Amit Langote 2016-01-06 08:32:44 Regression caused by recent change to initdb?