Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com, masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side
Date: 2020-03-03 03:09:09
Message-ID: 56877baa-6334-73ef-d703-db871d31ca2c@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/03/03 9:27, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Mon, 2 Mar 2020 17:29:30 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote in
>>> Attached is the updated version of the patch.
>>> The previous patch used only pgstat_progress_update_param()
>>> even when updating multiple values. Since those updates are
>>> not atomic, this can cause readers of the values to see
>>> the intermediate states. To avoid this issue, the latest patch
>>> uses pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(), instead.
>>
>> Attached the updated version of the patch.
>> Barring any objections, I plan to commit this patch.
>
> It is working as designed and the status names are fine to me.

Thanks for the review! I pushed the patch.

> The last one comment from me.
> The newly defined symbols have inconsistent indents.

Yes, I fixed that.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2020-03-03 03:12:52 Re: Fastpath while arranging the changes in LSN order in logical decoding
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2020-03-03 03:08:28 Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side