Re: psql - -dry-run option

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql - -dry-run option
Date: 2015-12-17 20:19:48
Message-ID: 567318E4.1080606@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/17/2015 11:58 AM, Christopher Browne wrote:
> On 17 December 2015 at 14:16, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>> or different idea - just enforce syntax check without execution.
>
> That seems pretty cool... I'd find "syntax check without execution" to
> be pretty useful to test SQL (and especially DDL).

Like this?
https://github.com/jconway/pgsynck

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2015-12-17 20:33:44 Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-12-17 20:13:21 Re: psql - -dry-run option