From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql - -dry-run option |
Date: | 2015-12-17 20:47:59 |
Message-ID: | 20151217204759.GP2618@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway wrote:
> On 12/17/2015 11:58 AM, Christopher Browne wrote:
> > On 17 December 2015 at 14:16, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com
> > <mailto:pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
> >> or different idea - just enforce syntax check without execution.
> >
> > That seems pretty cool... I'd find "syntax check without execution" to
> > be pretty useful to test SQL (and especially DDL).
>
> Like this?
> https://github.com/jconway/pgsynck
I thought the idea was to test the execution of the commands themselves,
not just the syntax. Something like add a column here and see whether
this other complex UPDATE populates it correctly.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mart Kelder | 2015-12-17 20:56:36 | Re: [PoC] Asynchronous execution again (which is not parallel) |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2015-12-17 20:47:55 | broken autocomplete in head |