Re: checkpointer continuous flushing

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Date: 2015-12-16 18:11:10
Message-ID: 5671A93E.1000900@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I'm planning to do some thorough benchmarking of the patches proposed in
this thread, on various types of hardware (10k SAS drives and SSDs). But
is that actually needed? I see Andres did some testing, as he posted
summary of the results on 11/12, but I don't see any actual results or
even info about what benchmarks were done (pgbench?).

If yes, do we only want to compare 0001-ckpt-14-andres.patch against
master, or do we need to test one of the previous Fabien's patches?

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-12-16 18:11:32 Re: use_remote_estimate usage for join pushdown in postgres_fdw
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-12-16 18:06:05 Re: fix for readline terminal size problems when window is resized with open pager