Re: honour TEMP_CONFIG in pg_upgrade tests

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: honour TEMP_CONFIG in pg_upgrade tests
Date: 2015-09-17 13:42:12
Message-ID: 5670.1442497332@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I propose to have the pg_upgrade test honour TEMP_CONFIG as pg_regress
> (or its Makefile) does, by applying the patch below. There might be
> opther places this should also be done, but this would be a start.

No objection to the concept, but I wonder if the -f test should
instead be a -r test (in the original place too, I guess).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shulgin, Oleksandr 2015-09-17 14:06:01 Re: On-demand running query plans using auto_explain and signals
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-09-17 13:37:04 Re: planstate_tree_walker