Re: Loggingt psql meta-commands

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Loggingt psql meta-commands
Date: 2015-12-10 22:52:38
Message-ID: 566A0236.3010301@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 12/10/2015 2:03 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>
> So some aspect of this:
>
> https://www.stigviewer.com/stig/database_security_requirements_guide/

thats a rather insane bunch of requirements. Reads like a wish list by
academic security researchers.

for instance
https://www.stigviewer.com/stig/database_security_requirements_guide/2015-06-23/finding/V-58123

??!? The database server has no clue about the difference between an
"application that it supports" and a user directly querying. The PSQL
shell, or dbadmin, is an 'application that it supports'.

at this point, speaking purely as a interested outsider (I am in no way
representing hte PG Development Group), I'd guess PostgreSQL probably
doesn't meet 2/3rds of those 'findings'. I truly wonder if any
standard RDBMS supports all or even most of them?!?

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message oleg yusim 2015-12-10 22:58:46 Re: Loggingt psql meta-commands
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2015-12-10 22:45:39 Re: Loggingt psql meta-commands