Re: Minor comment improvement to create_foreignscan_plan

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minor comment improvement to create_foreignscan_plan
Date: 2015-11-16 02:25:36
Message-ID: 56493EA0.2000101@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015/11/12 19:02, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On 2015/11/10 3:53, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Etsuro Fujita
>> <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> Here is a small patch to update an comment in create_foreignscan_plan;
>>> add fdw_recheck_quals to the list of expressions that need the
>>> replace_nestloop_params processing. I should have updated the comment
>>> when I proposed the patch for the fdw_recheck_quals.

>> OK, not a big deal, but thanks. Committed.

> Thanks!

Oops, I've found another one. I think we should update a comment in
postgresGetForeignPlan, too; add remote filtering expressions to the
list of information needed to create a ForeignScan node.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

Attachment Content-Type Size
postgresGetForeignPlan-comment.patch text/x-diff 715 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-11-16 02:27:33 Re: Proposing COPY .. WITH PERMISSIVE
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2015-11-16 02:10:42 Re: pglogical_output - a general purpose logical decoding output plugin