Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness
Date: 2015-10-03 20:17:35
Message-ID: 561037DF.9050705@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/02/2015 09:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Here's a rewritten patch that looks at postmaster.pid instead of
>> pg_control. It should be effectively the same as the prior patch in terms
>> of response to directory-removal cases, and it should also catch many
>> overwrite cases.
>
> BTW, my thought at the moment is to wait till after next week's releases
> to push this in. I think it's probably solid, but it doesn't seem like
> it's worth taking the risk of pushing shortly before a wrap date.
>
> If anyone wants to argue for including it in the releases, speak up ...

Wait, we're backpatching this?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-10-03 20:49:25 Re: jsonb_set array append hack?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-10-03 18:37:35 Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements