Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness
Date: 2015-10-03 04:39:04
Message-ID: 17711.1443847144@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Here's a rewritten patch that looks at postmaster.pid instead of
> pg_control. It should be effectively the same as the prior patch in terms
> of response to directory-removal cases, and it should also catch many
> overwrite cases.

BTW, my thought at the moment is to wait till after next week's releases
to push this in. I think it's probably solid, but it doesn't seem like
it's worth taking the risk of pushing shortly before a wrap date.

If anyone wants to argue for including it in the releases, speak up ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message dinesh kumar 2015-10-03 04:43:42 Re: Proposing COPY .. WITH PERMISSIVE
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2015-10-03 03:44:41 Re: Parallel Seq Scan