Re: updated win32 patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: updated win32 patch
Date: 2003-05-25 15:02:01
Message-ID: 5607.1053874921@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Jan, have you committed this change to CVS yet?

> No and I don't see any reason to do so. It was code we needed at
> PeerDirect for something that was never supposed to be contributed. I
> allways warned that one will have a hard time to get changes into the
> CVS that are only for support of proprietary stuff and of no benefit for
> anyone else.

Also, if I am guessing correctly at the point of that code, it's largely
duplicative of a feature that's already in CVS tip (PARSE message allows
types of parameter symbols to be deduced by parser).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-05-25 17:41:27 Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-05-25 14:57:11 Re: cleanup of cbrt() handling